Three different media houses reported three different sets of figures of non-genuine handsets switched off yesterday.
For one it was close to a million, for another it was just past the
millionth mark, and yet another the figure was just around two million
handsets.
While the three institutions peopled with hawk-eyed journalists
following a hot topic like switching off of fake handsets rarely all
get it wrong, the disparity in the figures points to lack of
co-ordination by the Communications Commission of Kenya.
The differences in the numbers switched off and whether it is the
correct way to go about the issue of non-genuine handsets played out in
the open when representatives from each mobile service provider
congregated on KTN’s Sunrise Business yesterday morning.
One service provider blatantly stated that it was the right thing to do, but using the wrong model.
The other said that the state –here read as CCK – was taking
handset manufacturers’ war to the doorsteps and at the costs of mobile
phone service providers and the ordinary citizenry who are not to blame
for the issue.
And, true to what this editorial had forecast earlier, the
Communications Commission of Kenya may have just bitten more than it
will chew.
This has led to questions dotting the entire exercise: Will the
switching off of non-genuine handsets result in another flop just as
the mobile number portability sometime awhile back or the current
tussle over reducing inter-connection rates? Did CCK – despite several
warnings – consolidate all the views and seek the best way forward in
addressing the issue of fake handsets? Will the exercise address the
issue of non-genuine handsets once and for all?
Lastly, what is the big bluff with non-genuine handsets when like
medicine there are generic versions of the handsets all over Africa?
There are unconfirmed reports that mobile phone operators have been
shocked at the presence of one IMEI number that has been reported
10,000 times. It is obvious that there is something amiss.
If not the discontent among the public over who to punish for fake
handsets, or the hue and cry that the blame lies squarely on CCK, Kenya
Bureau of Standards, and the anti-counterfeit agency who have kept a
very tight lip, then it is the insistence of CCK that seems to have
sold out the project.
While the exercise gets under way, it is interesting for example
that the anti-counterfeit agency has not raided any of the places where
non-genuine handsets are sold.
The agency, which many blame for the current exercise, also has not
made a single arrest of somebody importing or selling fake phones.
In addition to that, Kenya Bureau of Statistics has neither
condemned, nor supported nor issued any statement over an issue that
squarely falls under its docket.
The whole exercise was structured such that it is the mobile phone
companies to actually do the switching off of the fake handsets. But
how would a mobile company that stands to lose billions of shillings a
month undertake such an exercise without hesitation?
There is talk that the Government has agreed to handout some incentives for every phone the companies switch off.
o far in the public domain, it is not clear what the incentive is,
and whether it would be at a cost to the taxpayer, or even if the
customer who loses his handset would be compensated.
Taking it slow
As Kenyans ponder over these pertinent issues, it is important to
understand that mobile phone companies have expressed intent to switch
off the phones in batches of ten or 20,000 over weeks, or even months.
With that acknowledgement alone, it is clear that the very
institutions, which are mandated to carry out the exercise, are already
on a go-slow for economic reasons.
It is also important to note also that even with an ever-present
social media, almost nobody has authoritatively reported their phones
were found ‘fake’ and switched off – raising doubts over the actual
number so far disconnected. But which ever way it goes, no country,
except South Africa, has ever tried what Kenya is attempting.
Even for South Africa, the exercise was a flop and an embarrassment to the authorities.
Here is free advice to CCK: Non-genuine handsets are not welcome and must be switched off.
The secret, however, lies in approaching the problem boldly,
involving all the concerned bodies, including the affected consumers
and laying out an elaborate plan of execution.
It will be an embarrassment and a loss to the taxpayer to start on a wrong footing and accomplish almost nothing.

